Sonia Jaffe and Mark Shepard of the National Bureau of
Economic Research (NBER) have written a new paper, which compares the effects
of fixed-dollar subsidies for health insurance to subsidies that are linked to
premiums. They conclude fixed-dollar subsidies reduce taxpayers’ costs and
improve access. Unfortunately, the structure of subsidies in U.S. health
insurance has moved in the other direction.
Tax credits that subsidize health insurance offered in
Obamacare’s exchanges are based on the second-lower cost Silver-level plan in a
region. Intuitively, this implies insurers will not compete too much because
that would drive down subsidies. As long as subsidies chase insurance premiums,
premiums will be higher than otherwise.
Jaffe and Shepard examine evidence from Massachusetts’
health reform (“Romneycare”), which dates to 2006. Its costs
are still spiraling, and Jaffe estimates one factor is its design of
subsidies, which is similar to Obamacare’s:
Across several simulation years and
assumptions, we find a non-trivial upward distortion in the price of the
cheapest plan (to which Massachusetts’ subsidies are linked) of $4-26 per
month, or 1-6% of baseline prices. Although modest, these effects imply
meaningful increases in government costs. For instance, the $24/month subsidy
distortion (in our simulations for 2011) would translate into $46 million in
annual subsidy costs for Massachusetts, and over $3 billion if extrapolated
nationally to the ACA. We show that absent uncertainty, shifting to fixed
subsidies could let the government achieve the same coverage at 6.1% lower taxpayer
cost, or 1.3% greater coverage at the same cost.
(Sonja Jaffe & Bruce Shepard, Price-Linked Subsidies and Health Insurance Markups, Cambridge,
MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 23104, January 2017.)
The paper is a heavy read, full of PhD level economic theory
and modelling. Nevertheless, it demonstrates replacing Obamacare’s tax credits
with a fixed-dollar tax credit to subsidize health coverage is as close to a
free lunch as is possible in health reform.
No comments:
Post a Comment