One of Donald Trump’s campaign promises is
to make Health Savings Accounts more widely used. The purpose of HSAs is to
give patients more directly control over health spending, and reducing the
share of spending controlled by insurers. Unfortunately, the 2003 law which
established HSAs requires they be linked with a highly regulated type of health
insurance policy.
These policies, like all health insurance
today, give insurers power to dictate prices instead of allowing prices to be
formed through interactions between patients and providers (that is, a normal
market process). So, these health insurance policies are not as popular as truly
consumer-driven plans should be.
Nevertheless, HSAs (which are bank
accounts, not health insurance policies) are growing like gangbusters,
according to new research from the Employee
Benefits Research Institute (EBRI). As I wrote previously, EBRI is a rock-solid
member of the health-benefits establishment.
If Trump wants to expand the use of HSAs,
EBRI’s evidence suggests he is pushing on an open door. EBRI indicates there
were 20 million HSAs, with assets of about $30 billion, at the end of
2015. Over four in five HSAs were opened
since the beginning of 2011. Indeed, over half of HSAs were opened in just 2014
and 2015.
Further, HSAs become quite valuable over
time. The average balance in an HSA opened in 2004 or earlier (which includes
rollovers from an earlier, much more limited type of account) was $33,888. This
is because most account-holders are able to save money in them for future
health spending (even though account-holders in the 2004 or earlier cohort
spent an average of $2,595 from their HSA in 2015).
This is why it pays to open and HSA as
soon as possible. Young people understand this: 29 percent of account-holders
are under the age of 35. Expanding patients’ freedom to use HSAs to control
health spending directly should be a high priority for the next Administration.
No comments:
Post a Comment