Fair enough, which is why we advocate insurance for catastrophic events, just like for houses or automobiles. However, in the current system, insurers and hospitals are dropping the ball on even that:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Georgia faces separate lawsuits accusing it of sending reimbursement money for emergency room care directly to patients — and not to the hospital because it isn’t part of the insurer’s network.
That’s costing the hospitals money since patients don’t always turn over the funds, according to the lawsuits.
By sending money directly to patients, Polk Medical Center says the insurer forces the hospital to find ways to collect it. Even though patients are obligated to pay the facility the amount sent to them by Blue Cross, in some cases they have spent the money, according to the lawsuit.
The Polk lawsuit said that Blue C
ross, in its new payment process, was pursuing “retaliation’’ for the Cedartown, Ga., hospital’s not agreeing to “unreasonable and unfair” terms in order to be part of the insurer’s network. Hospital officials said the payment shift has hurt the hospital financially.
(Andy Miller, “Ga., Calif. Hospitals Sue Blue Cross Plan for Sending Reimbursements to Patients,” Georgia Health News, June 30, 2016.)Emergency departments patch people up first and ask for payment later. Nevertheless, Obamacare drove more patients into emergency departments, and hospitals are profiting from the shift.
Further, hospitals and emergency-department doctors have lobbied states to make insurers pay them whatever they charge, without negotiations. It is understandable that insurers are using this tactic to bring hospitals back to the negotiating table.
Health insurers and providers cannot even agree on prices for catastrophically expensive care. Yet we allow them to fix prices for every good and service in our health system. Why?