Iowa has become the tenth
state to enact the Interstate
Medical Licensure Compact. This is a great achievement for the medical
profession and state sovereignty. For almost a year now, I have been supporting
this effort and I am glad to see it succeeding.
On June 24, I attended a briefing conducted in the wake of
the compact hitting seven members. This started the wheels turning to establish
a commission that will actually execute and administer the interstate licensing
of physicians. At the meeting I learned a few things, a couple of which
surprised me:
First, the impetus for the intestate compact was growing
anxiety among physicians that Congress would assert a federal power to license
physicians. If state medical boards did not solve the problem of interstate
licensing, then they would lose the initiative. This did not surprise me.
Second, they do not need legislation in Congress to
authorize the compact. The states that have signed on can move right ahead.
This surprised me a little.
Third, the compact is not
about telemedicine. This surprised me a lot. I had thought it was all about
telemedicine. On the contrary, doctors sometimes visit patients across state
lines, and they want easy and responsible licensing in many states. One group at
the meeting was from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Its
affiliated physicians will sometimes have cause to practice in, e.g. West
Virginia.
This made me think the compact is not just for physicians in
rural areas. There are plenty of physicians who cross state lines between
Virginia, DC, and Maryland, or New Jersey and New York, or New York and
Connecticut, for example, who would benefit from the compact.
No comments:
Post a Comment