Caroline F. Pearson of the Avalere consulting firm has surveyed
states which have already published 2017 Obamacare exchange premiums. Among
eight states and the District of Columbia, the average requested rate hike is
16 percent for popular Silver plans:
Specifically, average proposed rate
increases across all silver plans in the nine states examined range from 44
percent in Vermont to 5 percent in Washington. In 2016, 68 percent of exchange
enrollees selected silver plans.
According to the data, in most
states, proposed premiums for lower cost silver plans increased less
dramatically or even went down for 2017, compared to higher-cost plans on the
same tier. Lower-cost silver plans tend to be most popular with consumers,
making this portion of the market more competitive as plans seek to attract
enrollees.
The devil is in the details: The lowest premium Silver plan
is going up seven percent, and the second lowest 8 percent, which means most
Silver plans are going up more than 16 percent.
This widening of premium dispersion is not what we would
expect in a functioning market. Instead, we would expect prices to converge
towards the lower premiums. The dispersion is explained by
Obamacare’s poorly
designed subsidies, which make the second-lowest cost Silver plan the “sweet
spot” for insurers, because that is where subsidies are maximized. Insurers
that want to shed market share, because they have lost money, increase the
difference between their offering and the second-lowest cost Silver plan.
Premiums in other “metal” tiers (Bronze, Gold, and Platinum)
are likely to increase at even faster rates, because insurers want to drive
beneficiaries into the second-lowest cost Silver plan, where taxpayers pick up
the biggest share of the tab.
Avalere’s analysis corroborates my
recent finding, that insurers are increasingly skilled at getting taxpayers
to pay a greater share of beneficiaries’ Obamacare premiums.
No comments:
Post a Comment